Education level and health profile related to global cognitive impairment in an urban community in West Jakarta, Indonesia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to investigate the association of global cognitive with chronic conditions, physical impairment, olfactory function, socio-demographics and other factors among older adults in the urban community, West Jakarta. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cross-sectional study involved 334 older adults aged 60 years and older who resided in urban community Jakarta, Indonesia. Trained interviewers visited and evaluated the respondents in the sub-district office. Cognitive function is examined using Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Indonesian Version (MoCA-INA). Respondents were clinically examined using a standardized protocol, which included medical history, general physical examination, cognitive assessment, and blood test for diabetes. RESULTS: Global cognitive impairment was significantly associated with being female (adjusted odd ratio [AOR]: 1.99, 95% CI: 1.14-3.50) and low education (AOR: 4.79, 95% CI: 2.80-8.18). Moreover diabetes, impaired balance, and olfactory dysfunction have AOR:3.23 (95% CI: 1.39-7.51), 2.55% (95% CI: 1.07-6.07), and 2.26 (95% CI: 1.32-3.85) respectively. CONCLUSION: This paper highlights that cognitively impaired and diabetic as well as low education subject in urban community, West Jakarta, Indonesia. Global cognitive impairment was associated with being female, having obtained low levels of education, having diabetes, impaired balance and olfactory dysfunction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".