Sexuality in people assigned female at birth with spinal cord injury: the challenges encountered
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) can impact sexual function negatively, and although most people continue to be sexually active post-injury, they often report decreased satisfaction in various aspects of sexual life. AIM: To gain insight into the sexual experience and functioning of people assigned female at birth (AFAB) with a SCI. METHODS: This study is part of an international observational questionnaire examining the reproductive health outcomes of individuals AFAB with SCI. The questionnaire was distributed to SCI organizations and support groups in 33 countries in four languages between 2019 and 2021. A total of 557 individuals AFAB with SCI, between the ages of 18 and 50, who completed the sexual health questions were included in this analysis. OUTCOME: Scores of Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI-6) in relation to the severity of the SCI based on the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale, level, and duration of SCI. RESULTS: Nearly 65% (170/263) of the study population within 10 years of injury had sexual dysfunction (SD) (FSFI-6 score less than or equal to 19), and participants with ASIA A had the most dysfunction (Mean score 15.95 + 7.52). Interestingly, although half of the study population scores as experiencing SD, only one-third describe SD as a concern associated with SCI. Though most of the changes were of a physical nature (inability to orgasm, pain during penetration, spasticity, barriers related to bowel/bladder problems and episodes of autonomic dysreflexia), psychosocial factors like the presence of concomitant anxiety/depression and sexual violence from a partner affected their sexual lives adversely. We attempt to elucidate the strategies adopted to improve sexual satisfaction that can help professionals involved in the SCI rehabilitative process. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Our results provide insight into the degree of SD, factors impacting sexual satisfaction and areas which need to be emphasized during the rehabilitation process of people AFAB with SCI. STRENGTH AND LIMITATIONS: This study is one of the largest of its kind, attempting to understand sexual functioning and factors impacting the sexual life of people AFAB post-SCI using a standardized tool, the FSFI score. As a voluntary survey, those who responded may not be fully representative of the population. CONCLUSION: Sexual health is an essential component of rehabilitation for individuals AFAB with SCI. Enhancing their sexual satisfaction requires a comprehensive approach that considers their physical, psychological and interpersonal circumstances.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".