Artificial intelligence-enabled automated analysis of transmission electron micrographs to evaluate chemotherapy impact on mitochondrial morphology in triple negative breast cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Advancements in transmission electron microscopy (TEM) have enabled in-depth studies of biological specimens, offering new avenues to large-scale imaging experiments with subcellular resolution. Mitochondrial structure is of growing interest in cancer biology due to its crucial role in regulating the multi-faceted functions of mitochondria. We and others have established the crucial role of mitochondria in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), an aggressive subtype of breast cancer with limited therapeutic options. Building upon our previous work demonstrating the regulatory role of mitochondrial structure dynamics in metabolic adaptation and survival of chemotherapy-refractory TNBC cells, we sought to extend those findings to a large-scale analysis of transmission electron micrographs. Here we present a UNet artificial intelligence (AI) model for automatic annotation and assessment of mitochondrial morphology and feature quantification. Our model is trained on 11,039 manually annotated mitochondria across 125 micrographs derived from a variety of orthotopic patient-derived xenograft (PDX) mouse model tumors and adherent cell cultures. The model achieves an F1 score of 0.85 on test micrographs at the pixel level. To validate the ability of our model to detect expected mitochondrial structural features, we utilized micrographs from mouse primary skeletal muscle cells genetically modified to lack Dynamin-related protein 1 (Drp1). The algorithm successfully detected a significant increase in mitochondrial elongation, in alignment with the well-established role of Drp1 as a driver of mitochondrial fission. Further, we subjected in vitro and in vivo TNBC models to conventional chemotherapy treatments commonly used for clinical management of TNBC, including doxorubicin, carboplatin, paclitaxel, and docetaxel (DTX). We found substantial within-sample heterogeneity of mitochondrial structure in both in vitro and in vivo TNBC models and observed a consistent reduction in mitochondrial elongation in DTX-treated specimens. We went on to compare mammary tumors and matched lung metastases in a highly metastatic PDX model of TNBC, uncovering significant reduction in mitochondrial length in metastatic lesions. Our large, curated dataset provides high statistical power to detect frequent chemotherapy-induced shifts in mitochondrial shapes and sizes in residual cells left behind after treatment. The successful application of our AI model to capture mitochondrial structure marks a step forward in high-throughput analysis of mitochondrial structures, enhancing our understanding of how morphological changes may relate to chemotherapy efficacy and mechanism of action. Finally, our large, manually curated electron micrograph dataset - now publicly available - serves as a unique gold-standard resource for developing, benchmarking, and applying computational models, while further advancing investigations into mitochondrial morphology and its impact on cancer biology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".