Cecal microbiome in broiler chicken related to antimicrobial feeding and bird’s sex
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study investigated the cecal microbiome of broilers raised under specific antimicrobial feeding programs (AFPs). A total of 2304 day-old Ross-708 male (M, n = 1152) and female (F, n = 1152) chicks were distributed into 48 floor pens which were allocated to one of three AFPs: Conventional, raised without medically important antibiotics (RWMIA), and raised without antibiotics (RWA). At 28 (D28) and 41 (D41) days of age, cecal contents were collected for culture dependent and independent analyses. At both 28 and 41 days, Enterococcus was more abundant in RWA-raised broilers than other groups with the most abundance of this bacterium being found in female birds ( P < 0.05). At D41, the most abundant Eimeria tenella counts was observed in RWA-raised broiler ceca ( P < 0.05). Sex effects were observed on the abundances of four of the 248 identified antimicrobial resistance genes while abundances of 10 were modulated by AFPs ( P < 0.05). Ceca of females birds showed more tssB than males, and ceca of RWMIA-raised birds contained the highest abundance of chuY genes regardless of sex. This study showed that in a specific feeding program, cecal resistome can be affected by chicken’s sex contributing to understand the AMR related to the AMU.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".