MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407877289 · doi:10.1016/j.ajcnut.2025.01.004

High-dose docosahexaenoic acid for bronchopulmonary dysplasia severity in very preterm infants: a collaborative individual participant data meta-analysis

2025· review· en· W4407877289 on OpenAlexafffund
Isabelle Marc, Pascal M. Lavoie, Thomas Sullivan, Étienne Pronovost, Amélie Boutin, Marc Beltempo, M Guillot, Jacqueline F. Gould, David Simonyan, Andrew J McPhee, Ibrahim Mohamed, Lynne Moore

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Clinical Nutrition · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineMontreal Children's HospitalUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversité Laval
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMcGill University
KeywordsBronchopulmonary dysplasiaDocosahexaenoic acidMeta-analysisMedicinePediatricsInternal medicineFatty acidPolyunsaturated fatty acidGestational ageBiologyPregnancyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Neonatal supplementation with high-dose docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) omega-3 may benefit neurodevelopment in very preterm infants, but concerns remain regarding a potential increased risk and severity of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). However, the interpretation of evidence on the effect of DHA on severe BPD is challenging because of the heterogeneity in the BPD definitions used across trials. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to determine whether, compared with placebo, neonatal enteral supplementation with high-dose DHA, mimicking placental transfer, is associated with severe BPD in very preterm infants using an individual participant data meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: RCTs were eligible if recently conducted in infants born with gestational age (GA) <29 wk and compared enteral supplementation with high-dose DHA alone with a placebo. Using a harmonized data set, the primary outcome of severe BPD was defined as the need for "high-flow" nasal cannula >2 L/min, noninvasive positive airway pressure, or invasive mechanical ventilation at 36 wk postmenstrual age. Secondary outcomes (N = 15) included death, "death or severe BPD," ordinal BPD severity grade, and common neonatal morbidities. Associations between high-dose DHA and outcomes were estimated using a one-stage meta-analysis approach. RESULTS: Two RCTs were identified in a systematic review (searched up to August 1, 2022; N = 2304) that met inclusion criteria (N = 1801; 904 DHA and 897 placebo; GA 26.7 ± 1.5 wk). Severe BPD in survivors occurred in 290/843 (34.4%) infants in the DHA group and 268/841 (31.9%) infants in the placebo group {relative risk [RR], 1.06 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.93, 1.21]; P = 0.36}. DHA was not associated with "death or severe BPD" [RR, 1.05 (95% CI: 0.94, 1.17); P = 0.41], the ordinal severity grade [odds ratio for a more severe grade, 1.20 (95% CI: 0.998, 1.45); P = 0.053], or other neonatal outcomes. There was limited evidence of heterogeneity for BPD-related outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Neonatal enteral supplementation with high-dose DHA was not significantly associated with severe BPD in very preterm infants. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT05915806, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05915806. META-ANALYSIS REGISTRY NUMBER AND WEBSITE: PROSPERO, CRD42023431063, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=431063.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.026
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.064
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.137

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0260.064
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0250.067
Bibliometrics0.0060.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.389
GPT teacher head0.555
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Clinical NutritionSame topicNeonatal Respiratory Health ResearchFrench-language works237,207