Chromosome homologies and polymorphisms in a Neotropical species complex of frogs revealed by the U2 snRNA gene
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Physalaemus cuvieri–Physalaemus ephippifer species complex is a Neotropical frog group that encompasses seven well-supported major clades. Although very similar morphologically, the five lineages previously karyotyped show notorious cytogenetic signatures. There is also evidence of ancient secondary contact between P. ephippifer, which has heteromorphic sex chromosomes, and the lineage known as L1B, which lacks sex chromosome heteromorphism. Here, to aid comparative analysis within this complex, we mapped the U2 small nuclear RNA (snRNA) gene using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). All samples presented a U2 snRNA gene cluster terminally in the short arm of chromosome 6. Additional small FISH signals were also revealed, particularly in one lineage with previously noted polymorphism of nucleolar organizer regions. Moreover, one additional site contributed for the analysis of sex chromosomes, since the Z chromosome of P. ephippifer harbors a small FISH signal, which is absent in the W chromosome. In lineage L1B, chromosome 9—which is homologous to the sex chromosomes of P. ephippifer—is polymorphic for a small FISH signal, as did the Z chromosome in the group derived from the contact between these lineages. Finally, nucleotide sequence analysis revealed some truncated gene sequences, suggesting the presence of pseudogenes of the U2 snRNA gene in these frogs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".