MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407880221 · doi:10.3390/jcm14051512

Descemet Stripping Only for Symptomatic Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy—A Retrospective Case Series Comparing ROCK-I vs. Hypertonic Sodium Chloride for Post-Surgical Adjuvant Therapy

2025· article· en· W4407880221 on OpenAlexaff
Eyal Cohen‬‏, Nizar Din, Sultan Aldrees, Michael Mimouni, Tanya Trinh, Nir Sorkin, Larissa Gouvea, Clara C. Chan, Allan R. Slomovic

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCorneal surgery and disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCorneal endotheliumVisual acuityOphthalmologyDystrophyPhacoemulsificationSurgeryHypertonic salineCorneaInternal medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: To report our experience with Descemet stripping only (DSO) for the treatment of Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy. Methods: Thirteen eyes of 9 patients with symptomatic Fuchs endothelial dystrophy underwent a 4 mm central Descemetorhexis without graft implantation between June 2017 and July 2020. All patients had central confluent guttata, undetectable central endothelial cell count by specular microscopy, and healthy peripheral corneal endothelium. In 6 eyes, the procedure was combined with phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation. Eight eyes were treated with topical rho-associated protein kinase (Rock) inhibitors and five eyes were treated with hypertonic sodium chloride 5%, post operatively. Results: All eyes completed at least 4 months of post-operative follow-up (mean follow-up 12.0 ± 7.9 mo; 4–29 mo). Mean patient age was 70 ± 6 years. All eyes achieved corneal clearance with an average time for clearance of 7.2 ± 2.4 weeks. Mean endothelial cell count postoperatively was 778 ± 228. Mean central corneal thicknesses pre- and postoperatively were 620 ± 100 and 560 ± 58 μm, respectively. Eleven eyes achieved improvement in visual acuity and in two eyes vision remained unchanged, with mean visual acuity 0.392 to 0.225 logMAR; p = 0.001. Also, all patients reported subjective improvement in the quality of vision. ROCK inhibitors compared to hypertonic sodium chloride 5% did not show statistically significant differences in time for corneal clearance or endothelial cell counts postoperatively but did show a trend towards faster corneal clearance and higher endothelial cell counts postoperatively among the ROCK inhibitors-treated eyes. Conclusions: In patients with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy and visual degradation secondary to central guttata, DSO represents a viable procedure for visual rehabilitation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical MedicineSame topicCorneal surgery and disordersFrench-language works237,207