MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407882059 · doi:10.1101/2025.02.23.639794

Latitudinal phylogenetic and diversity gradients are explained by a tropical-temperate transitional region

2025· preprint· en· W4407882059 on OpenAlexaff
David Lerner, Jason T. Weir, Tamir Klein, Gili Greenbaum

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicEvolution and Paleontology Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTemperate climateDiversity (politics)Phylogenetic diversityGeographyTropicsEcologyPhylogenetic treeEarth scienceGeologyBiologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The distribution of ecological and evolutionary forces throughout space bring about the patterning of biodiversity. In large geographical areas, this causes the regionalization of biodiversity into structured units known as bioregions. In order to understand how such patterns emerge, a clear delineation of bioregions is required. We use tree species as model taxa in order to analyze the global distribution of biodiversity and understand how latitudinal gradients of biodiversity, specifically the latitudinal phylogenetic and diveristy gradients are formed. By compiling an extensive dataset of tree species distributions and their phylogenetic relationships, we use a data-driven approach to delineate global bioregions of similar evolutionary histories, termed phyloregions. Our analysis reveals the presence of a region between the tropical and temperate regions, coined ‘bridge’ phylore-gion, with a unique evolutionary composition and characteristically weaker association to climatic and environmental parameters. Through simulations, we show that the pres-ence of latitudinal phylogenetic and diversity gradients are much more likely to emerge in the presence of an independent ecological region between tropical and temperate regions, suggesting that its role as a stepping-stone in colonization of species between distinct climatic zones has shaped latitudinal gradients. This study highlights that accurate de-lineation of evolutionary structures of biodiversity can reveal previously cryptic regions with fundamental evolutionary roles in the formation of biodiveristy patterns. 1 Significance Statement Biodiversity patterns are shaped by geography, forming distinctive units known as bioregions. At global scales there are important gradients in terms of species diversity and phylogenetic relations that are well documented, but the underlying processes that generate them are unclear. We comprised an extensive dataset of tree species distributions and phylogeny, and identified the bioregions from the dataset. We analyzed the diversity and the phylogenetic gradients and identified a previously cryptic bioregion between tropical and temperate zones. Though less climatically distinct, we show through simulations that the presence of this transition zone better explains latitudinal biodiversity patterns. Our findings refine the global dispersal dynamics of species between tropical and temperate regions and highlight the role of this intermediate region in shaping global biodiversity patterns.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicEvolution and Paleontology StudiesFrench-language works237,207