MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407900065 · doi:10.1109/twc.2025.3542359

Performance Analysis for NOMA-Assisted LEO Communications: A Two-Dimensional Stochastic Geometric Approach

2025· article· en· W4407900065 on OpenAlexaff
Shizhao Yang, Yongxu Zhu, Octavia A. Dobre, George K. Karagiannidis, Zhiguo Ding

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSatellite Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersMajor Science and Technology Project of Hainan ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsNomaComputer scienceStochastic geometryWirelessTelecommunicationsMathematicsTelecommunications linkStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The integration of non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) into low earth orbit (LEO) systems has the potential to facilitate the ubiquitous coverage with high spectrum efficiency. To characterize the fundamental limits of NOMA assisted LEO systems, this paper proposes a model for downlink NOMA-LEO system via modelling the locations of terrestrial users and LEO satellites as two homogeneous spherical Poisson point processes. In particular, a typical satellite uses NOMA to simultaneously serve the nearest and the farthest users within its visible range. The novelty of this paper is to first introduce an equivalent two-dimensional model that can significantly simplify the performance analysis of LEO systems. Then, considering that the satellite-terrestrial channel follows the Nakagami-<italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">m</i> fading, the closed-form expressions of the user association and the visible probability are studied under the scenario where the number of users visible to a randomly selected satellite is greater than one. Subsequently, the derived results are utilized to analyze the approximate moments of the conditional success probability and the signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio Meta distribution for both NOMA-LEO and orthogonal multiple access (OMA) LEO transmissions. Finally, the numerical results demonstrate that: <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1)</i> Asymmetric target rates can achieve a performance gain of NOMA over OMA in terms of the link reliability and the coverage probability, while symmetric settings still have merit for NOMA if there is a low requirement for reliability; and <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2)</i> Enhancements in the link reliability and the coverage probability are achievable through improvements in channel quality and reductions in orbital altitude and density. However, improving path loss develops the coverage probability but may not always yield an increase in the link reliability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.952
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Wireless CommunicationsSame topicSatellite Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207