MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407900403 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2025.3545296

Parameter-Efficient Federated Cooperative Learning for 3-D Object Detection in Autonomous Driving

2025· article· en· W4407900403 on OpenAlexafffund
Fangyuan Chi, Yixiao Wang, Panos Nasiopoulos, Victor C. M. Leung

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceObject detectionObject (grammar)Artificial intelligenceDistributed computingHuman–computer interactionComputer networkPattern recognition (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the rapidly evolving field of autonomous driving, accurately detecting and understanding dynamic environments remains a challenge. Federated learning (FL) offers a promising approach by integrating decentralized models from multiple connected autonomous vehicles (CAVs) to enhance the performance of deep-learning (DL)-based object detection methods. However, traditional FL faces hurdles, such as extensive data synchronization requirements, limited data variance, and high communication costs. This article introduces a federated cooperative learning framework that addresses these challenges by combining data from both CAVs and roadside units. The framework combines local cooperative perception with global FL through a parameter-efficient FL adapter and a lazy communication strategy, improving DL-based object detection capabilities across diverse driving scenarios while significantly reducing bandwidth requirements. We also present a novel multiagent-multitown dataset Vehicle-to-Everything-Fed, specifically developed to validate the effectiveness of our approach under various conditions. Notably, our framework retains 97.51% of the detection accuracy achieved by full-model FL, while utilizing only 1.4% of the bandwidth typically required, demonstrating substantial improvements over conventional FL strategies. This study underscores the potential of our tailored approach to substantially enhance autonomous vehicle technologies with minimal resource utilization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Open science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.716
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0070.005
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet of Things JournalSame topicPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in DataFrench-language works237,207