Parental apologies as a potential determinant of adolescents’ basic psychological needs satisfaction and frustration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
• Adolescent basic needs satisfaction and frustration are predictors of their healthy development • Whether and how parents apologize following mishaps may affect adolescent basic needs satisfaction and frustration • We tested this possibility at three levels (global, situational, hypothetical) with correlational and experimental designs • More victim-centered and less defensive apologies were related to higher needs satisfaction and lower needs frustration. • Parental apologies were indirectly related to adolescent social and psychological adjustment, via adolescent basic needs. Parenting research has documented positive associations between parents’ tendency to apologize following their mishaps and indicators of adolescents’ healthy development. One mechanism that may account for these benefits is apologies’ potential role in restoring the satisfaction of adolescents’ basic psychological needs, which may have been frustrated by parents’ mishaps. Yet the associations between parental apologies, adolescents’ basic needs, and ensuing developmental outcomes have never been studied. Furthermore, how parents phrase their apologies may differently relate to adolescents’ basic needs, with victim-centered apologies being more likely to be need-supportive and defensive apologies more likely to be need-thwarting. To address these issues, we recruited 347 mid- to late adolescents and assessed parental apologies as well as adolescents’ perceptions of their basic needs at three levels of abstraction (global, situational, and hypothetical) using correlational and experimental methods. At the global level, we also assessed indicators of adolescents’ healthy development that were previously linked to parental apologies (i.e., internalizing and externalizing problems and prosocial behaviors). Across abstraction levels, parental apologies—whether perceived, coded, or manipulated as presenting more victim-centered elements and fewer defensive elements—tended to be associated with higher needs satisfaction and lower needs frustration. Furthermore, path analysis showed that the relation between parental apologies and adolescents’ externalizing problems, internalizing problems, and prosocial behaviors could be fully accounted for by adolescents’ perceptions of their basic needs. These results suggest that parental apologies may play a role in adolescents’ basic psychological needs satisfaction and frustration and, in turn, in their development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".