Sensory Dysfunction in ALS and Other Motor Neuron Diseases: Clinical Relevance, Histopathology, Neurophysiology, and Insights from Neuroimaging
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: The clinical profiles of MNDs are dominated by inexorable motor decline, but subclinical proprioceptive, nociceptive and somatosensory deficits may also exacerbate mobility, dexterity, and bulbar function. While extra-motor pathology and frontotemporal involvement are widely recognised in motor neuron diseases (MNDs), reports of sensory involvement are conflicting. The potential contribution of sensory deficits to clinical disability is not firmly established and the spectrum of sensory manifestations is poorly characterised. Methods: A systematic review was conducted to examine the clinical, neuroimaging, electrophysiology and neuropathology evidence for sensory dysfunction in MND phenotypes. Results: In ALS, paraesthesia, pain, proprioceptive deficits and taste alterations are sporadically reported and there is also compelling electrophysiological, histological and imaging evidence of sensory network alterations. Gait impairment, impaired dexterity, and poor balance in ALS are likely to be multifactorial, with extrapyramidal, cerebellar, proprioceptive and vestibular deficits at play. Human imaging studies and animal models also confirm dorsal column-medial lemniscus pathway involvement as part of the disease process. Sensory symptoms are relatively common in spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy (SBMA) and Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia (HSP), but are inconsistently reported in primary lateral sclerosis (PLS) and in post-poliomyelitis syndrome (PPS). Conclusions: Establishing the prevalence and nature of sensory dysfunction across the spectrum of MNDs has a dual clinical and academic relevance. From a clinical perspective, subtle sensory deficits are likely to impact the disability profile and care needs of patients with MND. From an academic standpoint, sensory networks may be ideally suited to evaluate propagation patterns and the involvement of subcortical grey matter structures. Our review suggests that sensory dysfunction is an important albeit under-recognised facet of MND.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".