HERV Modulation in Colorectal Carcinoma Patients: A Snapshot of Endogenous Retroviral Transcriptome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Human endogenous retroviruses (HERVs) are proviral relics of infections that affected primates' germ line. Many HERV elements retain a residual capacity to encode transcripts and proteins that have been occasionally domesticated for the host physiology. In addition, HERV transcriptional modulation is of great interest to clarify the etiology of complex disorders such as cancer, even if a few studies assessed the specific HERV loci modulated in tumor tissues. In the present work, we used a transcriptomic approach to investigate the specific expression of ~3300 HERV loci in paired tumor and normal tissues of 7 colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. A total of 102 HERVs were significantly modulated in CRC, with a general tendency towards downregulation. Of note, among the 42 upregulated HERVs 23 belonged to the HERV-H group, that is the most investigated in CRC. De novo transcriptome reconstruction and qPCR validation allowed to identify a transcript from a HERV-H locus on chromosome Xp22.3 with high specific expression in CRC samples, potentially encoding for a partial Pol protein. These results provide a detailed description of HERV transcriptional variations in CRC and its interindividual variability, identifying a HERV-H transcript that deserves further investigation for its possible impact on tumor progression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".