MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407909901 · doi:10.1134/s2635167624601931

Analysis of the Allelic Structure of Photoperiodism Genes E1–E4 in Soybean Collections and Its Impact on the Timing and Duration of Flowering under the Growing Conditions of the Omsk Oblast

2024· article· en· W4407909901 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Pavel Yu. Kroupin, L. V. Omel’yanuk, М.А. Самарина, А.В. Архипов, А М Асанов, Daniil S. Ulyanov, Sergey A. Bursakov, Н.В. Злобнова, Gennady I. Karlov, М. Е. Мухордова, Yu. I. Yaschenko, М.Г. Дивашук

Bibliographic record

VenueNanobiotechnology Reports · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoybean genetics and cultivation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsphotoperiodismDuration (music)BiologyAlleleGeneGeneticsBotanyHorticultureArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Soybean is a strategically important agricultural crop that serves as a source of vegetable fat and protein. The processed products derived from soybean are utilized in the food, livestock, and various other industries. To expand soybean production in Russia, it is essential to develop varieties that are adapted to the agroclimatic conditions of northern latitudes, including Western Siberia, which is characterized by a relatively short growing season and long daylight period. To effectively develop adaptive early-flowering and early-maturing soybean varieties, it is essential to evaluate the impact of the E1, E2, E3, and E4 genes on the photoperiodic response of soybean and their influence on plant development timing under local conditions. A total of 102 accessions from the Omsk Agricultural Scientific Center’s collection were analyzed, including original varieties from the center, varieties from other domestic breeding centers, and foreign varieties and breeding accessions from Poland, Sweden, Belarus, Ukraine, Canada, and other countries. Data on flowering dates were collected from a field experiment conducted in the Omsk oblast between 2021 and 2023. Genotyping was performed using both classical PCR-based markers and next-generation markers based on competitive allele-specific PCR. The analysis revealed that the recessive alleles of the E loci, which produce a photoperiodically neutral phenotype (e1-as, e1-fs, e2-ns, e3-tr, e3-fs, e4-kes, e4-kes+e4-SORE-1), are predominant in the collection. Furthermore, it was determined that the E2 and E4 loci exert the most significant influence on the full flowering date, while the E3 locus has the greatest effect on the end date of flowering and the overall duration of flowering. The findings can be utilized in marker-assisted selection to develop early-flowering varieties of the Siberian ecotype.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.377
Threshold uncertainty score0.150

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNanobiotechnology ReportsSame topicSoybean genetics and cultivationFrench-language works237,207