MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407919896 · doi:10.1139/as-2024-0049

The thick-billed murre (<i>Uria lomvia</i>) in Northwest Greenland (Avanersuaq) relies on Arctic cod (<i>Boreogadus saida</i>) in a changing climate

2025· article· en· W4407919896 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Knud Falk, Flemming Ravn Merkel, Myrthe Bergsma, Kasper Lambert Johansen, Kaj Kampp, Aili Lage Labansen, Anders Mosbech, Masumitsu Oshima, Caroline Bouchard

Bibliographic record

VenueArctic Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArcticFisheryEcologyGeographyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Considering seabirds as indicators of environmental change, we compared thick-billed murre ( Uria lomvia (Linnaeus, 1758)) adult and chick diet in the North Water polynya region, NW Greenland, during 1997 and 2023. In the adult murre diet, fish accounted for 86% and 42% of food items by number, and 99% by wet mass (WM) in both 1997 and 2023. Arctic cod ( Boreogadus saida (Lepechin, 1774)) was the most important prey, contributing 90% and 99% of WM in 1997 and 2023, respectively. In 1997 the murres ate mostly small 1-year-old cod but in 2023 they mainly took larger 2- and 3-year-old Arctic cod. In the chick diet, gadids contributed 71% and 86% of prey items brought to the chicks in 1997 and 2023, respectively, supplemented by sculpins and eelpouts in 1997. Capelin ( Mallotus villosus (Müller, 1776)) increasingly occur in the area but did not appear in the murre diet. The study highlights a consistent reliance on Arctic cod, although with differences between sampling years in size of ingested specimens. We recommend continued monitoring of top predator diets, coupled with local knowledge, to understand the impacts of ongoing changes in the region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArctic ScienceSame topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207