MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407923794 · doi:10.14740/gr2010

Aspects on Self-Reported Symptoms in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Cross-Sectional Study

2025· article· en· W4407923794 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ali Someili, Amani Ahmed Mutaen, Abdullah M. Alqahtani, Raghad A Mobaraki, Yara A Mutaen, Ghaida S Almuhaysin, Mariam Tawhari, Ghadah Maghfori, Salem M Ayyashi, Nourah A Duhmi, Ramzi Moraya, Mostafa Mohrag, Mohammed Abdulrasak

Bibliographic record

VenueGastroenterology Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal motility and disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIrritable bowel syndromeMedicineCross-sectional studyGastroenterologyInternal medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is the major form of functional bowel disorders, where the diagnosis is based on set criteria and characterized by abdominal pain and changes in bowel habits. Epidemiological data, alongside self-reported outcomes, are of interest with regard to IBS, as these factors may need to be addressed to optimize underlying IBS. This study aims to examine the effect of IBS on certain aspects of life, including sleep quality alongside some epidemiological aspects with regards to the presence of IBS in the Jazan region of Saudi Arabia. Methods: Individuals were invited to participate in the study by replying to a validated questionnaire, whereby respondents self-identified as having IBS or not. Non-parametric comparisons using Fisher's exact test, between those with self-reported IBS versus those without IBS, were performed, with P < 0.05 considered significant. Results: Of 728 respondents, 244 (33.5%) had self-reported IBS, and 484 (66.5%) did not. Respondents with IBS were more likely female (P < 0.001), younger age (P = 0.002), city-dwelling (P = 0.028), divorced (P = 0.028) and smokers (P = 0.003). Overall, education level did not differ amongst the groups (P = 0.093). A minority (13.5%) of those with self-reported IBS were diagnosed by a gastroenterology specialist. Abdominal pain, distension, constipation and diarrhea were all more prevalent (P < 0.001) in the IBS group compared to the non-IBS group. The IBS group had poorer sleep quality compared to the non-IBS group (P = 0.006), although no difference in medications for sleep was present between the two groups (P = 0.271). Conclusions: Self-reported IBS was highly prevalent in our region, with risk factors for its presence being similar to those reported in previous studies. Sleep deprivation was highly prevalent in IBS patients, albeit not leading to increased prescription of relevant therapies for aid of sleep in these patients. However, marital separation and city-dwelling seemed to confer a higher self-reported IBS status. These issues should be investigated using more robust, Rome IV criteria-centered questionnaires in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.743

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.347 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGastroenterology ResearchSame topicGastrointestinal motility and disordersFrench-language works237,207