Base Pressure Control using Quarter Rib at Mach 1.3: A Comprehensive CFD Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study of base pressure and its control is an important research area in the transonic speed when the flow undergoes a sudden change in area. The turbulent flow in a separated region is still a crucial area of research due to the advent of space shuttles and high-performance military aircraft, and turbulent flow in transonic and supersonic flow is a thrust area for researchers. This paper focuses on base pressure control with sudden expansion at Mach 1.3 for an area ratio of 4.84. The flow field inside the duct is controlled through a passive control in the form of quarter ribs of radii 1 mm, 2 mm, 3 mm, and 4 mm for various duct lengths in the range from L = 1D to 6D for nozzle pressure ratios in the range from 3 to 11. Results show that a 1 mm rib is not adequate, and rib radii 2 mm, 3 mm, and 4 mm are effective in raising the base pressure values, and this rise in the base pressure continues till the duct length L = 1D to 4D. There is a marginal reduction in base pressure for the duct lengths L = 5D and 6D due to the ineffectiveness of the back pressure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".