MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407928009 · doi:10.21037/atm-24-138

A woman with a pleural mesothelioma and an inherited ATM mutation—a case report

2025· article· en· W4407928009 on OpenAlexaff
Marta Seca, John Cho, Angelina Tryon, Steven A. Narod

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Translational Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOccupational and environmental lung diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoPublic Health OntarioWomen's College Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMesotheliomaMedicineMutationPathologyCancer researchGeneticsBiologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Pleural mesothelioma (PM) is a rare and aggressive malignancy primarily linked to asbestos exposure. Up to 80% of patients have a history of such exposure. Several studies have investigated the possibility of a genetic predisposition for a subgroup of PM patients, but the data remains inconsistent. The ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) gene, crucial for DNA repair, is implicated in cancer susceptibility, with heterozygous mutations increasing risks, notably in breast and pancreatic cancers. Case Description: We present a case of a 42-year-old woman, with no asbestos exposure history, diagnosed with metastatic PM. Initial treatment with immunotherapy showed limited efficacy. Given the rarity in young females, she opted for genetic testing via “The Screen Project”, revealing a pathogenic ATM mutation. Due to enhanced radiosensitivity in ATM mutation carriers, to reduce adverse events conventional palliative radiotherapy (RT) was chosen over stereotactic hypofractionated RT. A follow-up computed tomography (CT) scan after 4 weeks indicated disease burden reduction. Conclusions: This case highlights the importance of genetic testing in atypical PM cases, guiding treatment decisions tailored to individual genetic profiles. Awareness of ATM mutations can optimize therapeutic strategies, particularly regarding RT choices, in managing this challenging malignancy. Integrating genetic insights into clinical practice holds promise for enhancing treatment outcomes and refining management strategies in PM and related conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.114
Threshold uncertainty score0.334

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of Translational MedicineSame topicOccupational and environmental lung diseasesFrench-language works237,207