MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effective permeability of fluvial lithofacies in the Bunter Sandstone Formation, UK

2025· article· en· W4407929563 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Water Resources · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersUniversity of Dhaka
KeywordsGeologyFluvialPermeability (electromagnetism)GeomorphologyGeotechnical engineeringGeochemistryPetrologyPetroleum engineeringStructural basin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Developed facies-scale models for 12 fluvial lithofacies in the Bunter Sandstone Formation. • Identified the representative elementary volume (REV) for each lithofacies, detailing its dimensions along depositional dip, strike, and vertical directions. • Determined the effective permeability of the lithofacies along depositional dip, strike, and vertical directions. • Computed horizontal-to-vertical permeability ratios for the lithofacies. • Showed a relationship between effective permeability and the proportion of high-permeability lithology at facies scale. Understanding effective permeability is crucial for predicting fluid migration and trapping in subsurface reservoirs. The Bunter Sandstone of northwestern Europe hosts major groundwater and geothermal resources and is targeted for CO 2 storage projects. Here the effective permeability of fluvial facies within the Bunter Sandstone Formation was assessed using facies-scale models. Twelve lithofacies were modeled based on core and outcrop observations of their geometries and dimensions. Permeability values from minipermeameter measurements were assigned to low- and high-permeability lithologies in each facies. The dimensions of a Representative Elementary Volume (REV) in depositional dip, depositional strike and vertical directions were determined by extracting sub-volumes from the models at different scales, calculating values of effective permeability for each sub-volume, and identifying the sub-volume at which the values of effective permeability stabilise as the REV. The REV dimensions vary with facies type and flow direction, but are typically of order tens of centimetres to metres in size, significantly larger than a typical core plug. Having identified the REV, we analyze the effective permeabilities of the different facies types. Normalized values of effective permeabilities in depositional dip, strike and vertical directions ( k d , k s , k v ), relative to the permeability of low- and high-permeability lithologies in each facies, display a positive linear correlation with the proportion of high-permeability lithology (clay-poor sandstone) for all facies. Therefore, the proportion of clay-poor sandstone, as measured in core data, can be used to predict facies-scale effective permeability in the Bunter Sandstone Formation, as well as in analogous fluvial deposits globally.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.464
Threshold uncertainty score0.263

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it