MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407933915 · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2024.12.477

Deep brain stimulation mitigates memory deficits in a rodent model of traumatic brain injury

2025· article· en· W4407933915 on OpenAlexaff
Thallita Kelly Rabelo, Ana Carolina Pinheiro Campos, Thiago Silva de Almeida, Faiza Mahmud, Miloš R. Popović, Luciene Covolan, Victor Hugo Cardoso Betta, Nir Lipsman, Mustansir Diwan, Clement Hamani

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain stimulation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurological disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkSunnybrook Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTraumatic brain injuryRodent modelNeuroscienceBrain stimulationDeep brain stimulationPsychologyStimulationPhysical medicine and rehabilitationMedicinePsychiatryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fibromyalgia is a debilitating musculoskeletal syndrome characterized by chronic pain, stiffness, fatigue, and depressed mood.Fibromyalgia affects 1.7% of Canadians, with a higher prevalence in females compared to males at a 9:1 ratio.The etiology is not well defined and chronic pain in fibromyalgia arises in the absence of tissue pathology, and consequently a lack of consensus on reliable diagnostic criteria.Current treatments often provide limited relief with adverse effects.High-frequency repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) is investigated as a therapeutic method for chronic pain to achieve analgesic-like effects.Studies targeting the primary motor cortex (M1) with rTMS have demonstrated reduced pain perception in fibromyalgia patients, though findings are inconsistent.Controlled pulse parameter TMS (cTMS) builds upon traditional rTMS, using monophasic pulses that can induce more profound and longerlasting changes in cortical excitability.Monophasic pulses activate more uniform populations of interneurons, leading to a cumulative effect that has greater changes in synaptic strength and neuronal activity.Thus, the proposed study aims to investigate the impact of a two-week intervention, 10 sessions in total, of active versus sham 10 Hz cTMS in individuals with fibromyalgia.Participants were pseudo-randomized to active or sham cTMS groups and outcomes were taken before, immediately following, and 3-months post-intervention.The primary outcome was pain intensity assessed using a numerical rating scale.Secondary outcomes included the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ), Euro 5-QoL, PROMIS-29 v2.1, activity levels, and patient-perceived global index of change (PGIC).Preliminary data suggests that cTMS reduces pain intensity as well as improves physical function, PCS, and activity levels.There was no difference in FIQ, PGIC, fatigue, or QoL.This is the first study of its kind to investigate the use of 10 Hz cTMS in fibromyalgia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.176
Threshold uncertainty score0.775

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrain stimulationSame topicNeurological disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207