MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407935053 · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2024.12.121

Unraveling the potential of transcranial photobiomodulation and ultrasound stimulation for brain therapeutics: an introduction

2025· article· en· W4407935053 on OpenAlexaff
Susana O. Catarino, Nuno Fernandes, Francisca Monteiro, Sofia Oliveira, Filipa Fernandes, F.S. Silva, Óscar Carvalho

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain stimulation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLaser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine
Canadian institutionsGeomechanica (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBrain stimulationMedicineNeuroscienceTranscranial magnetic stimulationPhysical medicine and rehabilitationStimulationPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The human brain is the most sophisticated and the finest processing unit ever designed, but mental and neurological disorders are an imminent threat to its functioning.Indeed, brain disorders comprise one of the most challenging health issues of modern society due to their tremendous health, social, and economic impact.However, pharmacological therapies face a physical obstacle e the blood-brain barrier (BBB) -that impedes most biopharmaceuticals from reaching brain tissues and thus blocks their efficiency.For this reason, researchers have been recently focusing on alternative, non-invasive, and drug-free therapeutic strategies to restore the healthy functionality and mechanobiology of the brain.Among these, non-invasive and natural-based therapeutic strategies such as transcranial photobiomodulation (tPBM, i.e., the application of modulated red/NIR light for therapeutic purposes) and ultrasound stimulation (tUS) are at the forefront of clinical interventions with the potential to improve different neuropathologies and the behavioral decline that typically accompanies neurodegeneration.These therapeutic stimuli have been proven to improve the metabolic activity of brain cells (including neurons and glia), block neuropathological mechanisms, alter the permeability of the BBB, among many others neuroprotective effects.However, these therapeutic solutions face four common barriers that hinder their wide clinical use: (1) limited knowledge of the optimal stimulation pattern; (2) insufficiently personalized stimulation; (3) limited access to deep brain structures; (4) poor stimulation selectively and spatial coverage.These barriers are a consequence of the insufficient understanding on how optical and ultrasonic waves interact with the brain and surrounding tissues and the bioavailability of the stimulus in targeted deep brain regions.For this reason, we believe that the development and optimization of optomechanical tools to mitigate neurodegeneration and stimulate brain activity require a holistic and integrated approach involving experimental, in silico, and in vitro models, from which efficient, customized, and innovative transcranial stimulation therapies may arise.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.880
Threshold uncertainty score0.382

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrain stimulationSame topicLaser Applications in Dentistry and MedicineFrench-language works237,207