Jacques Roger et l’histoire de la pensée scientifique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce dossier des Cahiers François Viète fait suite à une table ronde intitulée « Jacques Roger et l’histoire de la pensée scientifique » organisée le 10 mai 2022 à l’occasion du Congrès annuel de la Société de philosophie du Québec (SPQ). Le présent volume se propose d’interroger la méthode de travail et la diversité des objets d’études de Jacques Roger (1920-1990).Ce faisant, il contribue à combler une lacune majeure dans la littérature secondaire, en proposant une première étude d’ensemble consacrée à l’œuvre et au legs du dix-huitièmiste. Développant quelques propositions formulées par des chercheurs proches de Roger, ce numéro ouvre de nouveaux chemins d’enquête et contribue ce faisant à la reconstitution du panorama intellectuel de l’histoire et de la philosophie des sciences en France dans la seconde moitié du xxe siècle. This issue of Cahiers François Viète follows on from a symposium entitled « Jacques Roger et l'histoire de la pensée scientifique » held on May 10 2022 at the annual Congres of the Société de philosophie du Québec (SPQ). The aim of this issue is to explore the objects of study and the methods of Jacques Roger (1920-1990). In so doing, it contributes to filling a major gap in secondary literature, by proposing the first comprehensive study devoted to the work and the legacy of the eighteenth-century scholar. Developing the proposals put forward by researchers close to Roger, this issue opens new vistas and contributes to the reconstruction of the intellectual panorama of the history and philosophy of science in France in the second half of the 20th century.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".