MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407939230 · doi:10.1093/eurjpc/zwaf101

Mental health status and quality of life after an acute myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries or takotsubo syndrome: a systematic review

2025· review· en· W4407939230 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Philip Leissner, Erik Olsson, Elisabet Rondung, Runa Sundelin, Jonas Spaak, Anders Ulvenstam, Anna M. Nordenskjöld, Lena Kövamees, Patrik Lyngå, Claes Held, Per Tornvall, Sophia Humphries

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Preventive Cardiology · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTakotsubo Cardiomyopathy and Associated Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersVetenskapsrådetRiksförbundet HjärtLung
KeywordsMedicineMyocardial infarctionMental healthCINAHLAcute coronary syndromeCochrane LibraryInternal medicineQuality of life (healthcare)Coronary arteriesCardiologyMeta-analysisPsychological interventionArteryPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) and takotsubo syndrome (TS) are both characterised by lack of significant coronary artery stenoses and a higher prevalence of mental health disorders preceding the event. Currently, little is known about their pathological aetiologies and subsequent treatment plans, giving cause for concern among those affected. The objective of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of mental health status and quality of life (QoL) in MINOCA- and TS-patients after the acute event, compared to both cardiac and non-cardiac populations, and over time. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted via Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PyschINFO, PubMed, ASSIA, Web of Science, Scopus and Embase from inception to May 2024. The review was registered in PROSPERO and methods, and results were reported in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Quality assessment and risk of bias were evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cross-sectional and cohort studies. RESULTS: Sample sizes ranged from 13 to 5,322 participants. The risk of bias was high in 18/28, medium in 7/28, and low in 3/28 studies. Across the symptoms assessed, MINOCA- and TS-patients reported worse mental health status or QoL than non-cardiac groups in 10/13 studies, and cardiac groups in 10/20 studies. Investigating change over time, 1/5 studies found deteriorating mental health status, 3/5 reported improved mental health status or QoL and 1/5 reported no change in MINOCA- and TS-patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with MINOCA or TS seem to have worse mental health status and QoL after the acute event than non-cardiac individuals, but it is yet difficult to conclude whether mental distress and QoL are equal or worse compared to CHD-patients. There is no convincing evidence that mental health status or QoL of MINOCA- and TS- patients naturally improve over time after the acute event. Among the studies evaluated, risk of bias was high. More high-quality studies are needed, investigating mental health status and QoL among MINOCA- and TS-patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Preventive CardiologySame topicTakotsubo Cardiomyopathy and Associated PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207