Autologous Chin Augmentation with Cervico-mental Angle Correction in Burn Scar Contracture
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Microgenia, retrogenia, cervico-mental angle obtusity, and lower lip ectropion are complications of severe burn scar contracture and are associated with functional and psychosocial disturbances. These complications can be managed in several ways, for example using fat or dermo-fat flap as autologous tissue transposition appears appropriate for simultaneous chin augmentation with cervico-mental angle improvement. We aimed to delay skin grafting to increase the chance of complete integration. From November 2015 to February 2023, 12 patients who underwent surgical treatment with fat or dermo-fat flap and delayed skin graft were included in the study. In this prospective study, we measured the cervico-mental and Legan's angles using the Digimizer Software pre- and post-operatively on 8 (7 female, 1 male) eligible patients who signed the informed consent. Although several methods are available for chin augmentation, transposition of tissues through structural rearrangement to address all the problems appears to be a cost-effective alternative for patients with obtusity due to hypertrophic scar of cervico-mental area with microgenia and retrogenia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it