Unexpected landscape-scale contemporary gene flow and fine-scale genetic diversity in rural hedgehogs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Agricultural intensification is one of the major forces driving populations of many traditionally common native species into smaller, fragmented populations which are prone to isolation and loss of genetic diversity. Identifying the spatial extent and characteristics of rural systems that support gene flow and promote genetic diversity for these species is thus essential for their long-term conservation. Here we used asymmetric autosomal genetic structure between sexes to investigate current gene flow among four neighbouring suburban populations of hedgehogs ( Erinaceus europaeus ) in England, which are separated by agricultural land. Contrary to expectations, we found that individuals belonged to a single genetic population despite the populations being separated by unoccupied agricultural land. Spatial autocorrelation was significant in adult female hedgehogs, but non-significant in adult males, revealing male driven contemporary gene flow between local populations. The results suggest that male hedgehogs are capable of moving between population patches separated by at least 3 km across the agricultural matrix. This finding is crucial to aid the development of a conservation strategy for hedgehogs as, for the first time, it shows the extent that previously assumed isolated populations across a perceived inhospitable landscape are connected by current gene flow. Higher within patch relatedness, and lower allelic richness were found from smaller suburban patches, largely reflecting local population size, indicating an early stage of genetic diversity loss due to habitat loss and associated fragmentation. Our study illustrates that considering current gene flow and local genetic diversity together is important to better understand habitat effects on genetic variation and to inform future conservation management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".