MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407944877 · doi:10.1186/s40001-025-02396-8

Clinical study on the effects of over time window thrombectomy and thrombolytic therapy on granulocyte colony-stimulating factor expression and postoperative brain function after acute cerebral infarction

2025· article· en· W4407944877 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Maobin Ye

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean journal of medical research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineThrombolysisInternal medicineConfoundingCerebral infarctionTissue plasminogen activatorGranulocyte colony-stimulating factorMontreal Cognitive AssessmentCorrelationStroke (engine)SurgeryIschemiaMyocardial infarctionCognitive impairmentChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the effects of thrombectomy and thrombolytic therapy beyond the standard time window on granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) expression and postoperative brain function in patients with acute cerebral infarction. METHODS: Sixty patients with acute cerebral infarction, who met the defined time window criteria, were randomly assigned to either the observation group (n = 30) or the control group (n = 30). The observation group underwent thrombectomy using the TREVO stent, while the control group received intravenous thrombolysis with rt-PA, a human tissue plasminogen activator. Comparative analyses between the two groups focused on G-CSF levels, NIHSS scores, MoCA scores, and the modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI) scale. Multivariate linear regression was performed to adjust for confounding factors including age, sex, and comorbidities. The Pearson correlation method was employed to assess the correlation between post-thrombectomy outcomes and G-CSF expression, as well as the impact on postoperative brain function. RESULTS: At 72 h and 90 days post-procedure, both groups demonstrated an increase in G-CSF levels and MoCA scores, accompanied by a decrease in NIHSS scores. Notably, the observation group exhibited significantly higher G-CSF levels and MoCA scores compared to the control group, alongside significantly lower NIHSS scores (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis confirmed the treatment group as an independent predictor of improved outcomes (P < 0.05). The rate of successful vascular recanalization was substantially higher in the observation group (90.00%) compared to the control group (56.67%). There was a significant positive correlation between NIHSS scores, MoCA scores, mTICI, and post-thrombectomy G-CSF expression (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In patients with acute cerebral infarction beyond the conventional time window, the use of TREVO stent thrombectomy and recanalization is effective, resulting in marked improvements in cognitive function. Moreover, G-CSF appears to play a critical role in the pathophysiology of acute cerebral infarction, establishing a strong association between G-CSF expression and postoperative brain function in affected individuals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.365 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean journal of medical researchSame topicAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementFrench-language works237,207