MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407946961 · doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(24)00476-5

The evolution of serious health-related suffering from 1990 to 2021: an update to The Lancet Commission on global access to palliative care and pain relief

2025· article· en· W4407946961 on OpenAlexaff
Felícia Marie Knaul, Héctor Arreola‐Ornelas, Xiaoxiao Jiang Kwete, Afsan Bhadelia, William E. Rosa, Michael Touchton, Oscar Méndez-Carniado, Valentina Vargas, Tania Pastrana, Joseph Friedman, Stephen R. Connor, Julia Downing, Dean T. Jamison, Eric L. Krakauer, David Watkins, Renzo Calderón-Anyosa, Rodrigo Garcia-Santisteban, Liliana De Lima, Nahla Gafer, Liz Grant, Christian Ntizimira, Pedro Emilio Perez‐Cruz, M. R. Rajagopal, Dingle Spence, Lukas Radbruch

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Global Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Institutes of HealthNational Cancer InstituteMedical Research CouncilUniversity of EdinburghUniversity of Miami
KeywordsCommissionPalliative careMedicinePain reliefGlobal healthMEDLINEFamily medicinePolitical scienceNursingPublic healthLawSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The Lancet Commission on global access to palliative care and pain relief introduced the concept of serious health-related suffering (SHS) to measure the worldwide dearth of palliative care. This Article provides an extended analysis of SHS from 1990 to 2021 and the corresponding global palliative care need. METHODS: This Article is the first to apply the SHS 2·0 method published in 2024, incorporating prevalence data from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study to improve non-decedent estimates that account for country-level epidemiological variation; adjusting for non-decedent double counting of HIV/AIDS, cancer, cerebrovascular disease, and dementia; improving the non-decedent estimates for cancer using survivorship data from the Global Cancer Observatory and for HIV/AIDS incorporating access to antiretroviral therapy; differentiating by sex; considering more specific age groups allowing for better estimates, especially in children; and adding endocrine, metabolic, blood, and immune disorders to the health conditions causing SHS. We describe SHS trends globally and within country income groups, differentiating among decedents and non-decedents, by health conditions, sex, and across child and adult age groups. FINDINGS: The SHS global burden increased by 74% between 1990 and 2021 to almost 73·5 million individuals, with population growth accounting for only half of that increase. Low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) accounted for 80% of SHS, with an increase of 83% from 1990 to 2021 compared with a 46% increase in high-income countries (HICs). Between 1990 and 2021, the decedent burden increased by 35%, whereas SHS in non-decedents more than doubled, accounting for 63% of SHS by 2021. The proportion of SHS from communicable diseases declined, especially in LMICs; however, the absolute number stayed relatively stable and even increased from 2019 to 2021 with the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. SHS from non-communicable diseases drastically increased, led by cancer (excluding leukaemia), cardiovascular diseases, and dementia in HICs. HIV/AIDS continued to be a major contributor, accounting for a substantial share of SHS in sub-Saharan Africa. The share of SHS in children decreased from 25% of SHS in 1990 to 14% in 2021 and accounted for 33% of SHS in low-income countries, compared with 2% in HICs. In 2021, SHS in low-income countries was concentrated in female individuals aged 20-49 years (affecting 59% of this population); in HICs, SHS was concentrated in female individuals aged 70 years and older (affecting 54% of this population and probably related to dementia). INTERPRETATION: SHS and the associated need for palliative care is a major and persistent but not insurmountable challenge for health systems worldwide. Our findings highlight the urgency to both reduce the avoidable SHS burden through prevention and treatment, and guarantee comprehensive, universal access to palliative care as an equity and health system imperative, especially in LMICs. FUNDING: University of Miami, USA; Cancer Pain Relief Committee; Medical Research Council; GDS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.457
Threshold uncertainty score0.979

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.460
Teacher spread0.379 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations64
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet Global HealthSame topicPalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesFrench-language works237,207