Reperfused Myocardial Infarction
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Canadian Cardiovascular Society recently put forth a new classification of acute reperfused myocardial infarction (MI) based on stages of myocardial injury. Backed by more than 5 decades of intense investigation in the field, the key message of this new classification is that not all MIs are the same and that the type and extent of myocardial injury should be considered in diagnosing and treating MI. We review the literature with the goal of highlighting the progressive advances that enabled the synthesis of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society classification into 4 distinct stages of tissue injury. We emphasize the major breakthroughs from insights gained from experimental, translational, and clinical studies to date. We also identify current gaps in knowledge and critical research directions that need to be pursued to improve patient care and reduce post-MI complications such as chronic heart failure and malignant arrhythmias, whose risk is linked to stage and extent of myocardial injury.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it