MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407955310 · doi:10.1016/j.ejc.2025.104139

Injective edge colorings of degenerate graphs and the oriented chromatic number

2025· article· en· W4407955310 on OpenAlexafffund
Peter Bradshaw, Alexander Clow, Jingwei Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Combinatorics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Graph Theory Research
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMathematicsChromatic scaleCombinatoricsInjective functionDegenerate energy levelsEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionDiscrete mathematicsComputer sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Given a graph G , an injective edge-coloring of G is a function ψ : E ( G ) → N such that if ψ ( e ) = ψ ( e ′ ) , then no third edge joins an endpoint of e and an endpoint of e ′ . The injective chromatic index of a graph G , written χ inj ′ ( G ) , is the minimum number of colors needed for an injective edge coloring of G . In this paper, we investigate the injective chromatic index of certain classes of degenerate graphs. First, we show that if G is a d -degenerate graph of maximum degree Δ , then χ inj ′ ( G ) = O ( d 3 log Δ ) . Next, we show that if G is a graph of Euler genus g , then χ inj ′ ( G ) ≤ ( 3 + o ( 1 ) ) g , which is tight when G is a clique. Finally, we show that the oriented chromatic number of a graph is at most exponential in its injective chromatic index. Using this fact, we prove that the oriented chromatic number of a graph embedded on a surface of Euler genus g has oriented chromatic number at most O ( g 6400 ) , improving the previously known upper bound of 2 O ( g 1 2 + ɛ ) and resolving a conjecture of Aravind and Subramanian.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.168
Threshold uncertainty score0.297

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of CombinatoricsSame topicAdvanced Graph Theory ResearchFrench-language works237,207