MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407956463 · doi:10.1007/s12145-025-01811-2

Rotation-based outlier detection for geochemical anomaly identification in stream sediment multivariate data

2025· article· en· W4407956463 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEarth Science Informatics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersJames Cook University
KeywordsMultivariate statisticsAnomaly (physics)OutlierAnomaly detectionSedimentGeologyIdentification (biology)Rotation (mathematics)Multivariate analysisData miningComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceGeomorphologyPhysicsMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This research explores the use of the rotation-based outlier detection (ROD) method for identifying geochemical anomalies in a multivariate stream sediment dataset from Iran, targeting porphyry and vein-type Cu mineralization. Geochemical datasets often present challenges for outlier detection methods like local outlier factor (LOF) and k-nearest neighbor (KNN), which rely on distance or density metrics and require parameter tuning (e.g., neighborhood size k). High-dimensional feature spaces further complicate their application. ROD, in contrast, offers a parameter-free, rotation-based approach that effectively analyzes geometric relationships between samples in subspaces, mitigating the curse of dimensionality. This makes ROD particularly suited to high-dimensional geochemical datasets, where complex relationships between elements (due to lithology or mineralization) are critical for identifying anomalies. This study compares ROD with LOF and KNN using two subsets of geochemical variables (Ag, As, Au, Bi, Co, Cr, Cu, Mo, Ni, Pb, Sb, Zn; and Ag, As, Au, Cu, Mo, Sb) and evaluates its performance based on the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and the number of known mineral occurrences detected in anomaly class. ROD outperforms LOF and KNN, capturing 78% (14 out of 18) of known Cu-bearing mineral occurrences. Moreover, ROD shows better conformity between 10% of highest outlier scores and Cu-mineralization sites. Rotation cost function in ROD, evaluated using the median absolute deviation (MAD), enhances its ability to detect outliers by focusing on orientation rather than distance, and by reducing noise misclassification. In addition, the parameter-free design of ROD and improved handling of high-dimensional data makes it a promising tool for geochemical exploration, as it captures unique mineralization-related signals that might be missed by traditional methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.840
Threshold uncertainty score0.372

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it