MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407957605 · doi:10.5492/wjccm.v14.i2.99445

Association between neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and hematoma expansion in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2025· review· en· W4407957605 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Andrea Loggini, Jonatan Hornik, Jessie Henson, Julie Wesler, Alejandro Hornik

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMeta-analysisOdds ratioInternal medicineIntracerebral hemorrhageNeutrophil to lymphocyte ratioPublication biasRandom effects modelConfidence intervalSample size determinationLymphocyteSubarachnoid hemorrhageStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND Hematoma expansion (HE) typically portends a poor prognosis in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Several radiographic and laboratory values have been proposed as predictive markers of HE. AIM To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on the association of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and HE in ICH. A secondary outcome examined was the association of NLR and perihematomal (PHE) growth. METHODS Three databases were searched (PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane) for studies evaluating the effect of NLR on HE and PHE growth. The inverse variance method was applied to estimate an overall effect for each specific outcome by combining weighted averages of the individual studies’ estimates of the logarithm odds ratio (OR). Given heterogeneity of the studies, a random effect was applied. Risk of bias was analyzed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The study was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis guidelines. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (No. CRD42024549924). RESULTS Eleven retrospective cohort studies involving 2953 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Among those, HE was investigated in eight studies, whereas PHE growth was evaluated in three. Blood sample was obtained on admission in ten studies, and at 24 hours in one study. There was no consensus on cut-off value among the studies. NLR was found to be significantly associated with higher odds of HE (OR = 1.09, 95%CI: 1.04-1.15, I 2 = 86%, P < 0.01), and PHE growth (OR = 1.28, 95%CI: 1.19-1.38, I 2 = 0%, P < 0.01). Qualitative analysis of each outcome revealed overall moderate risk of bias mainly due to lack of control for systemic confounders. CONCLUSION The available literature suggests that a possible association may exist between NLR on admission and HE, and PHE growth. Future studies controlled for systemic confounders should be designed to consolidate this finding. If confirmed, NLR could be added as a readily available and inexpensive biomarker to identify a subgroup of patients at higher risk of developing HE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.872
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0150.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Journal of Critical Care MedicineSame topicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ResearchFrench-language works237,207