Bedaquiline, pretomanid, linezolid, and moxifloxacin treatment for multi-drug resistant extrapulmonary tuberculosis in Canada: a report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Updated global tuberculosis (TB) guidelines recommend the novel oral 6-month bedaquiline, pretomanid, linezolid, and moxifloxacin (BPaLM) regimen for multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) based on superior efficacy and reduced toxicity demonstrated in clinical trials. These trials were dominated by isolated pulmonary TB; thus, data for BPaLM effectiveness for extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) remains limited. Methods: We describe the safe and effective use of BPaLM in a patient for the treatment of MDR-TB involving an extrapulmonary site. Results: Bedaquiline and pretomanid were obtained through the Health Canada Special Access Program and from the manufacturers 3 weeks later. The patient with gastrointestinal and subclinical pulmonary TB tolerated the 6 months of BPaLM well with no treatment interruptions. There was sustained microbiological and clinical response at 6 months after treatment completion. Conclusion: Shorter duration, improved effectiveness, and reduced toxicity suggests that BPaLM should be considered when determining the ideal treatment regimen for MDR-TB. A more streamlined process for the procurement of bedaquiline and pretomanid will help minimize treatment initiation delay and overall isolation period. Further research is also needed to clarify longer-term outcomes and optimal dosing of BPaLM for EPTB, especially in more severe forms of disease or with malabsorption concerns.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".