Influence of sloping ground and pile group on sand reliquefaction behavior using centrifuge modelling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present study aims to examine the behavior of sand reliquefaction phenomenon on gently inclined sloping ground subjected to repeated seismic events. The seismic sequence represents the combinations of foreshocks and aftershocks associated with mainshock events. Free field and pile group models were experimented with in a sloping ground with 5° inclination using centrifuge modelling. A 2 × 2 pile group model was inserted in Toyoura sand, and results were compared with that with free field model ground. Tapered sinusoidal waveform was inputted at a constant 1 Hz shaking frequency, whereas the acceleration amplitude and shaking duration for the mainshocks were considered twice that of foreshocks and aftershocks. Two different seismic sequences with six shaking events were imparted to the model grounds to investigate the influence of slope and presence of pile group on sand reliquefaction behavior. The time history responses were recorded in the form of acceleration, excess pore pressure (EPP), bending moment, and lateral displacement and presented. The response indicates that sloping ground was stable under the action of foreshocks, whereas it collapsed during mainshocks, primarily due to liquefaction. The mainshock has transformed the gently inclined sloping ground to levelled ground model. This transformation has resulted in increased bending moment values in the pile group. Resistance to reliquefaction was smaller compared to first liquefaction, primarily due to change in soil state and increase in magnitude of anisotropy. Presence of slope has resulted in higher EPP response and bending moment values compared to levelled ground. GeoPIV analysis and visualization show the flow of sand particles from upside to downside due to lateral spreading at shallow depths that initiated the slope failure. The foreshocks and aftershocks are not very significant in increasing the resistance to reliquefaction. Meanwhile the presence of the pile group has reduced the EPP generation during repeated shaking events.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".