The coupling effect of sloshing and vibrations of a rectangular tank subjected to rectilinear motion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study focuses on analyzing the interactions that occur between sloshing and hydroelastic vibrations in the wall plate of a rectangular tank that contains fluid when it is subjected to rectilinear motion. Previous research has often examined the sloshing and fluid-structure interaction problem independently of each other. By contrast, this study adopts a unified approach that simultaneously addresses both phenomena through the solution of coupled equations of motion . This formulation utilizes the energy approach and the assumed modes method. The present study also derives a standard eigenvalue problem for the free vibration of the plate in conjunction with sloshing. Moreover, it explores the impact of the tank's rectilinear base movement on the coupled responses of the plate and sloshing. This approach facilitates the prediction of sloshing behavior and its influence on the elastic wall, as well as the examination of how wall vibrations affect sloshing motion. To experimentally validate the theoretical results, a rectangular tank with an elastic side wall was constructed and then partially filled with water. The obtained experimental results were consistent with the numerical predictions .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".