MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407965339 · doi:10.1186/s40942-025-00646-9

Effects of cigarette smoking on retinal thickness and choroidal vascularity index: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2025· review· en· W4407965339 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Miguel A. Quiroz-Reyes, Erick A. Quiroz-Gonzalez, Miguel A. Quiroz-Gonzalez, Virgilio Lima-Gómez

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Retina and Vitreous · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVascularityMedicineRetinalChoroidOphthalmologyMeta-analysisConfoundingObservational studyInternal medicineSurgeryRetinaBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Smoking increases oxidative stress, affecting the vascular endothelium by decreasing the antioxidant vitamin C and disrupting regular nitric oxide activity. It reduces blood flow in the retina and choroid due to increased vascular resistance and compromised choroidal blood flow regulation compared to nonsmokers. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to elucidate the impact of cigarette smoking on retinal thickness and the choroidal vascularity index (CVI). METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed across multiple databases, including Web of Science, Medline, PubMed, and Embase, adhering to the PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. Observational studies were selected to explore the relationships between smoking and ocular parameters such as CVI, full-retinal, and choroidal thickness. Two independent reviewers conducted the data extraction and quality assessment using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Statistical analysis was performed using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Four out of the 743 identified articles, involving 702 eyes, met the inclusion criteria. The analysis revealed a significant reduction in the CVI among smokers (SMD: -0.61, 95% CI: -0.78 to -0.43, p < 0.00001), indicating compromised choroidal vascularity. In contrast, the impact of smoking on subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) was not statistically significant (mean difference: 3.88 μm, 95% CI: -7.34 to 15.10, p = 0.50), with high heterogeneity (I² = 79%). Additionally, the full-retinal thickness (FRT) did not show a significant difference between smokers and nonsmokers. CONCLUSION: Cigarette smoking negatively affects choroidal vascularity, as indicated by a significant reduction in CVI. However, its impact on FRT and SFCT remains unclear and requires further research. These findings highlight the importance of smoking cessation for eye health and suggest that CVI is a valuable noninvasive biomarker for monitoring vascular changes in smokers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024627478.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.563
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Retina and VitreousSame topicRetinal Diseases and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207