Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary Between 1992 and 1995, Bosnia and Herzegovina suffered a major armed conflict. This brought major disruption of the urban system to the capital, Sarajevo. This conflict caused a fracture inside the society and its urban identity. After the immediate reconstruction stage, a new process called post-conflict transition, event or disaster followed and required the collaboration of actors at multiple scales. This promoted the realization of new urban and societal projects. The tourism sector is one of these projects, creators, and carriers of new representations of the city, promoting the reconstruction of the tourist destination and the renewal of urban identity through a new tourism development of the city, which promotes the memory of the past conflict. These representations, modelled by the different urban actors (local and national, international, tourist and cultural policies), are transmitted to the tourist level through the urban space, bringing them to the attention of tourists, which can promote territorial attractiveness and economic benefits for local populations. However, following a conflict, the decision making actors of the city can make conflicting choices, particularly in the case of cities that have experienced internal conflicts. The case highlights the situation of Sarajevo between 2022 and 2024, increasingly embracing the European model of the cultural and sustainable tourist city, while preserving the memory of the past conflict, against a backdrop of political and identity crises. Information © The Author 2025
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".