MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407977137 · doi:10.1016/j.jtct.2025.01.383

Durable Clinical Benefits in Transfusion-Dependent Β-Thalassemia with Exagamglogene Autotemcel

2025· article· en· W4407977137 on OpenAlexaff
Haydar Frangoul, Franco Locatelli, Peter Lang, Roland Meisel, Donna A. Wall, Selim Corbacioglu, Amanda Li, Josu de la Fuente, Ami J. Shah, Ben Carpenter, Janet L. Kwiatkowski, Markus Y. Mapara, Robert I. Liem, Maria Domenica Capellini, Mattia Algeri, Antonis Kattamis, Sujit Sheth, Stephan A. Grupp, Hayley Merkeley, Kevin H.M. Kuo, Joachim Rupprecht, Puja Kohli, Gang Xu, Leorah Ross, Bo Tong, William Hobbs

Bibliographic record

VenueTransplantation and Cellular Therapy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaSickKids FoundationBC Children's HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThalassemiaMedicineBlood transfusionIntensive care medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Exagamglogene autotemcel (exa-cel) is a cell therapy that reactivates HbF via non-viral, ex vivo CRISPR/Cas9 gene-editing at the erythroid enhancer region of BCL11A in autologous CD34 + hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs). Exa-cel is approved for patients aged ≥12 years (yrs) with transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia (TDT). We report data from ongoing Phase 3 CLIMB THAL-111 and CLIMB-131 trials. Methods Participants (pts; 12-35yrs) with TDT and history of ≥100mL/kg/y or ≥10units/yr RBC transfusions in 2yrs before screening were eligible. Following pharmacokinetic-adjusted busulfan myeloablation and exa-cel infusion, pts are monitored for engraftment, Hb, HbF, BCL11A -edited alleles, transfusions, and adverse events (AEs). Primary endpoint is proportion of pts achieving a maintained weighted average Hb ≥9g/dL without RBC transfusion for ≥12months (mos) after exa-cel, starting 60days after last RBC transfusion (TI12). Data reported as mean (range) unless noted. Results As of May 2024, 56 pts (21.2 [12-35] yrs), including 20 adolescents (14.8 [12-17] yrs), were infused with exa-cel following 1.3 (range 1.0-4.0) mobilization cycles and myeloablative busulfan conditioning, with a median follow-up of 34.7mos (4.5-63.8). Thirty-five (62.5%) pts had severe genotypes (β0/β0, β0/β0-like). 44/56 pts completed 2yrs of follow-up in CLIMB THAL-111 and transitioned to CLIMB-131. After exa-cel infusion, all pts engrafted neutrophils and platelets (median 29.0 [12-56] and 43.5 [20-200] days). Median duration of neutropenia was 20.5 (4-48) days and time to hospital discharge was 39.0 (23-110) days. Notably, 49/52 (94.2%) evaluable pts achieved TI12 in CLIMB THAL-111 and stopped RBC transfusion after 1.1mos (SD, 0.6). Duration of transfusion independence was 32.4 (14.3-60.8) mos. For the 3 pts who did not achieve TI12 in CLIMB-111, 2 achieved TI12 in CLIMB-131 (duration transfusion free: 23.0 and 15.7mos), while 1 stopped transfusion for 4.8mos. Mean total Hb remained at normal/near normal levels of ≥12g/dL from Month 5 onward, and mean HbF were consistently ≥11g/dL at Month 5 onward with pancellular distribution. Proportion of edited BCL11A alleles was stable in bone marrow CD34 + HSPCs and remained stable from Month 2 onward in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Most AEs occurred within the first 6mos, with 2 pts with serious AEs (previously reported) related to exa-cel that resolved; there were no deaths, discontinuations due to AEs, or malignancies. Conclusion Durable transfusion independence was achieved in >94% of pts receiving exa-cel, with associated clinically meaningful and sustained increases in HbF and total Hb for up to 5yrs of available follow-up. Exa-cel's safety profile remains consistent with busulfan myeloablation and autologous transplantation. These findings confirm exa-cel's potential as a one-time functional cure for patients with TDT.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueTransplantation and Cellular TherapySame topicHemoglobinopathies and Related DisordersFrench-language works237,207