Enhancing Safety and Accessibility for Wheelchair Users in Traditional Tuna Fishing Boats
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Traditional Sekoci tuna boats lack accessibility features, creating significant challenges for wheelchair users.This study addresses these limitations by applying universal design principles to redesign Sekoci boats, emphasizing accessibility, safety, and operational efficiency.Key innovations include wheelchair-specific safety features, ADA-compliant ramps, hydraulic lifts, wider pathways, and optimized cabin and restroom layouts.Using Bentley Maxsurf Academic Software for stability and motion, stability analysis confirmed compliance with IMO standards under full-load conditions.Seakeeping analysis evaluated vessel motion in head seas and quartering head seas at 0 and 7 knots, ensuring stability and usability under varying conditions.The results demonstrate that the redesigned vessel enhances accessibility and safety without compromising operational performance, offering an inclusive solution for wheelchair users.This study advances barrier-free design in small-scale fisheries, promoting equity and inclusivity in maritime operations.Future research should focus on real-world testing to refine the design and establish guidelines for accessible fishing vessels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it