MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4407983051 · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1480024

Understanding key factors contributing to mental health challenges among pediatric nurses: a systematic review

2025· review· en· W4407983051 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Godfrey Mbaabu Limungi, Mohammed Elmadani, Klára Simon, Osama Hamad, Éva Horváth, Patty Livia, Orsolya Máté

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Public Health · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMental healthKey (lock)MedicinePsychologyPsychiatryComputer scienceComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The mental health and wellbeing of nurses, particularly pediatric nurses, have garnered attention due to the increased risk of mental health challenges associated with their demanding profession. These nurses are especially vulnerable, yet their mental wellbeing is often understudied. Objective: This systematic review aims to identify and analyze key factors associated with mental health challenges among pediatric nurses and explore how these factors interact to influence their wellbeing. Methodology: The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024553062) and adhered to PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search was conducted across six databases: PubMed Scopus, CINAHL, Web of Science, Medline, and Embase. Eligible studies included both qualitative and quantitative studies that examined factors linked to mental health challenges among pediatric nurses. The quality of the studies was appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Data extraction and synthesis involved qualitative content analysis to identify key factors. Results: Five studies from China, Turkey, Greece, Canada, and Saudi Arabia were included. The key factors identified were high workload, poor work environment, limited resources, and strained interpersonal relationships, lack of support, irregular shift patterns, demanding roles, and financial strain. These factors were significantly associated with increased stress, burnout, anxiety, and depression among pediatric nurses. The interaction of these factors created a complex web influencing their mental health, with supportive work environments and adequate financial compensation mitigating some negative effects. Conclusion: This systematic review identifies high workload, poor work environment, limited resources, and strained interpersonal relationships, lack of support, irregular shift patterns, demanding roles, and financial strain as key factors impacting the mental wellbeing of pediatric nurses. These factors interact to exacerbate stress, burnout, anxiety, and depression. Effective interventions should include manageable nurse-to-patient ratios, adequate resource allocation, fostering a supportive work culture, flexible scheduling, targeted support for senior nurses, and improved financial compensation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.069
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.079

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.069
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.007
Bibliometrics0.0130.013
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.273
GPT teacher head0.481
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Public Health→Same topicHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnout→French-language works237,207→