MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407983059 · doi:10.62347/zrfi2658

Synergistic effect of Majoon-e-Suranjaan and isometric exercises in improving rheumatoid arthritis

2025· article· en· W4407983059 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Translational Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicTherapeutic Uses of Natural Elements
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersKing Saud University
KeywordsIsometric exerciseRheumatoid arthritisMedicinePhysical therapyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: The study aimed to evaluate the synergistic effects of Majoon-e-Suranjaan with and without isometric exercises in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).Methods: A prospective, pragmatic, community based, parallel group, single blinded randomized controlled trial conducted at Muhammad Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Clinic and Rehabilitation Centre, Multan, from May to October 2023.The trial was approved and registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT20230202057310N5).Ninety-five patients were randomly assigned to two groups.Group A received Majoon-e-Suranjaan (5 g orally, twice daily).Group B received the same dosage of Majoon-e-Suranjaan along with The isometric exercises.The exercise protocol for group B consisted of three weekly sessions, each lasting 40 minutes.Patients were evaluated at baseline and at the 24 th week based on serological markers, including rheumatoid factor (RF), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), disease activity score (DAS), and C-reactive protein (CRP), as well as X-ray findings such as nodules and bone degeneration in affected joints.Pain, morning stiffness, and functional activities were assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) and the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS).Results: Of the 95 patients randomized, 90 completed the 24-week treatment.Among them, 60 (66.6%) were female, and 30 (33.3%) were male.Group B showed significantly greater improvements compared to Group A in in WOMAC activities of daily living (P=0.001),WOMAC stiffness (P=0.004),WOMAC pain and DAS (P=0.000),NPRS (P=0.001).Additionally, Group B demonstrated significant improvements in RF (P=0.001),ESR (P=0.002), and CRP (P=0.003)compared to group A. Conclusions: This study demonstrated the synergistic effect of Majoon-e-Suranjaan and isometric exercises in RA patients, highlighting the potential for more effective RA treatment strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.485
Teacher spread0.441 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Translational ResearchSame topicTherapeutic Uses of Natural ElementsFrench-language works237,207