A prospective clinical study of allergy progression in identical and fraternal twin pairs of children
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Understanding the factors leading to the development of allergic disease is a critical area of research. We studied the development of allergic disease in identical and fraternal twins to identify potential differences in environment versus genetic factors. Methods: Twins aged up to 4 years were selected for inclusion in this long-term follow-up study. Regular questionnaire results, allergen levels, and other indicators were examined. Results: A total of 80 twins were included in this study. Over time, the incidence of atopic dermatitis (AD) decreased, and the incidence of rhinitis and wheezing increased. The incidence of AD, rhinitis, and food allergy was significantly higher in identical twins than fraternal twins. The consistency of positive inhaled allergens and positive food allergens was significantly higher in the identical twins than fraternal twins. The factors influencing allergic diseases were analyzed. In the identical twins, AD was more frequent in males, those with a birth weight <2,500 g, and having siblings; rhinitis was more frequent in those living in a bungalow style home, having pets, and carpeting; and wheezing was more frequent in males, having a birth weight <2,500 g, and having siblings. In the fraternal twins, AD was more frequent in those born <37 weeks gestation, and having flowers and plants in the house; rhinitis was more frequent in those born <37 weeks gestation, those with a history of neonatal asphyxia, and having a household smoking; and wheezing was more frequent in those born <37 weeks gestation, those with a history of neonatal asphyxia, with central heating, and household smoking. No factors were found to affect the occurrence of food allergy. Conclusions: Allergic diseases in children have a strong genetic predisposition, but are also influenced by environmental factors. The environmental factors affecting the occurrence of allergic diseases in identical and fraternal twins differ.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".