The added value of community-based organisations in retaining people living with HIV (PLHIV) in the continuum of care in Mali
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Retention in care of people living with HIV (PLHIV) is a crucial public health issue in Mali. Several barriers to retention have been highlighted, including socioeconomic status, gender, sexual orientation, HIV-related stigma, as well as organisational and structural barriers, such as public insecurity and sub-optimal public services. We explored the role of community health workers (CHWs) in PLHIV retention in care in Mali. METHODS: project, eight focus groups (FG) and 20 individual interviews were conducted in 2021 among PLHIV at ARCAD Santé PLUS, a Malian community-based organisation (CBO). Participants included PLHIV who self-identified with key populations (KP) (men who have sex with men, female sex workers, people who inject drugs, and transgender women). RESULTS: Among the 60 PLHIV interviewed, 50% self-identified with KP. The median age and interquartile range were 35 years [28.5; 43.0] and 25% had a tertiary education. Four main themes emerged concerning CHWs' role in fostering retention in care: (i) Good patient-physician relationships in ARCAD Santé PLUS's structures; (ii) Social support between peers in the CBO; (iii) Peer educators (a sub-category of CHWs) as facilitators of continuous antiretroviral treatment distribution, and care and (iv) Free healthcare access in the CBO and financial support for transportation. CONCLUSION: Peer educators play an essential role in PLHIV (general public and KP) retention in care in Mali in terms of psychosocial and logistical support. The non-judgmental approach of physicians working in CBO is also a major factor in retention.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".