Physical activity during pregnancy: key beliefs to support intervention
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Physical activity (PA) provides maternal and fetal health benefits, but only 27.5% of Canadian pregnant women meet PA recommendations. Theory-based interventions like the theory of planned behavior (TPB) are useful in explaining what drives behavior. The first objective of this study was to validate the TPB model to predict prenatal moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), including testing of the novel interaction between intention and perceived behavioral control (PBC). The second objective was to identify which specific beliefs predict intention toward prenatal MVPA to support intervention.Method We used a prospective correlational design. Healthy pregnant women completed two electronic questionnaires: at baseline, to assess TPB constructs, and one month later, to assess MVPA practice. Structural equation modeling was conducted with Latent Moderated Structural Equations. The interaction was interpreted with the pick-a-point method and the Johnson-Neyman graphical method.Results The sample consists of 193 women (Mage = 31.2±3.6). Results indicate that prenatal MVPA at one month was marginally predicted by intention (β = 0.149; p < 0.10) and PBC (β = 0.322; p < 0.05, MVPA R2 = 20%), but when their interaction was added to the model, MVPA R2 increased to 44%. Specifically, the relationship between intention and MVPA is stronger when PBC is high (0.5 standard deviation over the mean). In the full model including the interaction, attitude (β = 0.59; p < 0.001), subjective norm (β = 0.20; p < 0.01) and PBC (β = 0.26; p < 0.05) all made a significant contribution to predicting MVPA intention (R2 = 88%). Finally, the following beliefs displayed significant indirect paths toward the intention of being physically active: behavioral beliefs: unlikely to be more tired and likely feel better mentally; normative beliefs: approval from friends and from mother/father; and control beliefs: being tired and missing social support.Conclusion Interventions aiming to promote regular MVPA during pregnancy should prioritized the six significant beliefs identified to significantly predict intention toward prenatal MVPA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".