MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4407998076 · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.124.049315

Clinical Severity and Outcomes in Large Infarcts With Endovascular Therapy: A Post Hoc Analysis of the ANGEL-ASPECT Trial

2025· article· en· W4407998076 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Qixuan Lu, Lina Zheng, Ximing Nie, Mengxing Wang, Wanying Duan, Xin Liu, Zhe Zhang, Miaowen Wen, Zhonghua Yang, Xinyi Leng, Yuesong Pan, Thanh N. Nguyen, Liping Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineModified Rankin ScaleStroke (engine)Post-hoc analysisRandomized controlled trialOdds ratioInternal medicineClinical trialCardiologySurgeryIschemic strokeIschemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Endovascular therapy (EVT) has been proven effective for patients with acute ischemic stroke with large infarcts. This study aimed to explore the impact of clinical severity on the efficacy of EVT in such patients. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of the ANGEL-ASPECT trial (Endovascular Therapy in Acute Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusive Patients With a Large Infarct Core), a randomized controlled trial that enrolled patients from 46 centers across China between October 2, 2020, and May 18, 2022. These patients had large infarcts (defined as Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score of 3–5 or infarct-core volume 70–100 mL) due to anterior-circulation large vessel occlusion within 24 hours after stroke onset with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 6 to 30. Patients were randomized into either the EVT group or the medical management alone (MM) group. For this analysis, we categorized the patients into 2 subgroups: moderate stroke and severe stroke, based on a baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of either <20 or ≥20. The primary outcome was the ordinal 90-day modified Rankin Scale score (0, no symptoms, to 6, death). RESULTS: Among 455 eligible patients, 347 (76.3%) presented with moderate stroke (170 received EVT, 177 underwent MM), and 108 (23.7%) had severe stroke (60 received EVT, 48 underwent MM). A significant shift toward better outcomes in the 90-day modified Rankin Scale distribution was observed in the EVT group compared with the MM group (generalized odds ratio, 1.66 [95% CI, 1.29–2.13]; P <0.001) among patients with moderate stroke. However, this was not the case for those with severe stroke (generalized odds ratio, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.54–2.10]; P =0.87), indicating a significant interaction ( P =0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute large infarcts, EVT was associated with improved functional outcomes compared with MM in patients with moderate stroke. However, no significant difference was observed in patients with severe stroke. Therefore, stroke severity should be considered when selecting patients with large infarcts for EVT. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT04551664.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management→French-language works237,207→