“VID-KIDS” Video-Feedback Interaction Guidance for Depressed Mothers and Their Infants: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
VID-KIDS (Video-Feedback Interaction Guidance for Depressed Mothers and their Infants) is a positive parenting programme comprising three brief nurse-guided video-feedback sessions (offered in-person or virtually via Zoom) that promote “serve and return” interactions by helping depressed mothers to be more sensitive and responsive to infant cues. We examined whether mothers who received the VID-KIDS programme demonstrated improved maternal–infant interaction quality. The secondary hypotheses examined VID-KIDS’ effects on maternal depression, anxiety, perceived parenting stress, infant developmental outcomes, and infant cortisol patterns. A parallel group randomized controlled trial (n = 140) compared the VID-KIDS programme to standard care controls (e.g., a resource and referral programme). The trial was registered in the US Clinical Trials Registry (number NCT03052374). Outcomes were assessed at baseline, nine weeks post-randomization (immediate post-test), and two months post-intervention. Maternal–infant interaction quality significantly improved for the intervention group with moderate to large effects. These improvements persisted during the post-test two months after the final video-feedback session. No significant group differences were detected for secondary outcomes. This study demonstrated that nurse-guided video-feedback can improve maternal–infant interaction in the context of PPD. These findings are promising, as sensitive and responsive parenting is crucial for promoting children’s healthy development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".