The Effect of Annealing on the First Hydrogenation Behavior of Atomized Ti48.8Fe46.0Mn5.2 Alloy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we report the effect of annealing on the first hydrogenation behavior of Ti48.8Fe46.0Mn5.2 alloy. This alloy was produced by gas atomization, and a portion of the powder was subjected to vacuum annealing at 1120 °C for 1 h. The goal was to investigate the usefulness of this atomized powder for hydrogen storage and also to investigate the effect of annealing. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images revealed that both atomized and annealed alloys exhibit a two-phase structure. The atomized alloy consists of a main TiFe matrix and a filamentous Ti2Fe-like phase. After annealing, the microstructure is globular. In addition to the microstructure, there was a change in the chemical composition of the matrix and secondary phase after annealing. The first hydrogenation at room temperature of both atomized and annealed samples required cold rolling. However, the kinetics was much slower for the annealed sample compared to the atomized sample. After the first hydrogenation, the XRD analysis identified the main phases as TiFe, TiFeH0.94, and Ti2FeH3, indicating that both the TiFe and Ti2Fe phases participated in hydrogen absorption during hydrogenation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".