Long-Term Outcomes and Predictors of Recurrence in Atrial Arrhythmia Ablations Post-Fontan Procedure: A Retrospective Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) is common in patients who have undergone a Fontan procedure and is poorly tolerated. SVT recurrence rates after catheter ablations are high. Recent data on the outcomes of SVT ablation and the predictors of recurrence in this population are limited. Methods: Electronic medical records of patients who had undergone a Fontan procedure and SVT ablation between January 1, 1995, and October 1, 2023, at a tertiary care center were reviewed. Demographic, clinical, and outcome variables over 5 years were compared between patients with and without SVT recurrence. Results: Twenty-five patients (56% male, mean age 31.5 ± 7.2 years) with a mean age of 6.1 ± 3.6 years at Fontan surgery were included. Ablation success rate was 92%. Recurrence occurred in 12 (48%) patients, of whom 7 (28%) required repeat ablations. Thirteen (59%) patients had a cardiac hospitalization, and one patient died in the 5-year follow-up period. Atypical (71%) and typical (33%) right atrial flutter were the most common SVTs. Higher brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels pre- (1,702 vs. 242, P = 0.028) and post-ablation (862 vs. 112, P = 0.017) were associated with recurrence. Atriopulmonary (AP) Fontan type (91% vs. 17%, P = 0.0006), number of radiofrequency (RF) applications (48 vs. 14, P = 0.045), post-ablation cardiovascular (CV) hospitalizations (82% vs. 36% P = 0.030), and post-ablation antiarrhythmic prescriptions (1.8 vs. 1.2, P = 0.0256) were more prevalent in patients with recurrence. Conclusion: Catheter ablation of SVT in patients with Fontan physiology is associated with a high success rate and a high long-term recurrence rate. Recurrence of SVT is associated with markers of severe heart disease and type of Fontan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".