MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408010178 · doi:10.1097/jpo.0000000000000551

The Arabic Version of the Prosthesis Embodiment Scale (AR-PEmbs): Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity in Lebanese Individuals with Lower-Limb Amputation

2025· article· en· W4408010178 on OpenAlexaff
N. Saleh, Zainab Yassine, Marwa Summaka, Fatima Hamieh, Ibrahim Naim

Bibliographic record

VenueJPO Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicProsthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Canadian institutionsCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArabicAdaptation (eye)Reliability (semiconductor)AmputationScale (ratio)ValidityTranslation (biology)Physical medicine and rehabilitationProsthesisPsychologyComputer scienceMedicineArtificial intelligenceClinical psychologyPsychometricsLinguisticsGeographyPsychiatryPhysicsPhilosophyCartographyNeuroscienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Introduction This study aimed to translate and cross-culturally adapt the Arabic version of the Prosthesis Embodiment Scale for Individuals with lower-limb amputation (AR-PEmbS-LLA) and evaluate its validity and reliability. Methods The AR-PEmbS-LLA was developed using a forward-backward translation process, expert reviews, and pilot testing with 10 individuals with lower-limb amputation (LLA). A cross-sectional, correlational study was conducted with 60 Lebanese adults with major LLAs who used prosthetic devices. Participants completed the AR-PEmbSLLA and the Houghton scale for prosthetic use, the revised Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scale (TAPES-R) for adjustment and satisfaction, and the Locomotor Capabilities Index (LCI) for locomotor abilities. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and exploratory factor analysis were performed to assess the psychometric properties of the AR-PEmbS-LLA. Convergent validity was evaluated using Spearman correlations with the other scales. Results The AR-PEmbS-LLA demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.97) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.95, P < 0.01). Exploratory factor analysis confirmed a single-factor structure explaining 78.23% of the variance. Significant correlations were found with TAPES-R general adjustment ( r = 0.37, P < 0.001), social adjustment subscales ( r = 0.33, P = 0.001), and the LCI basic activities score ( r = 0.39, P < 0.001), and the LCI advanced activities score ( r = 0.35, P < 0.01). Conclusions The AR-PEmbS-LLA is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing prosthesis embodiment in Arabic-speaking individuals with LLA. It can be effectively used in clinical and research settings to understand and enhance the prosthesis integration experience. Clinical Relevance The AR-PEmbS-LLA represents a valuable addition to the limited toolkit for evaluating and optimizing prosthetic outcomes in Arabic-speaking individuals with LLA, enhancing clinical practice and research endeavors in this field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.318
Threshold uncertainty score0.344

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJPO Journal of Prosthetics and OrthoticsSame topicProsthetics and Rehabilitation RoboticsFrench-language works237,207