MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408012062 · doi:10.1016/j.geomat.2025.100053

Prediction and monitoring of soil pH using field reflectance spectroscopy and time-series Sentinel-2 remote sensing imagery

2025· article· en· W4408012062 on OpenAlex
Weichao Sun, Shuo Liu, Bowen Zhou, Xia Zhang, Kun Shang, Wei Jiang, Ziang Jiang

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGEOMATICA · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil Geostatistics and Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of China
KeywordsRemote sensingReflectivityEnvironmental scienceSeries (stratigraphy)Field (mathematics)Time seriesSoil scienceGeologyComputer scienceOpticsMathematicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Soil pH is an important property that is widely used in soil and environmental sciences. Remote sensing imagery could significantly improve the prediction efficiency and has the advantage of periodic monitoring. To investigate and monitor soil pH efficiently, time-series Sentinel-2 remote sensing imagery was used for predicting and monitoring of soil pH. The study area selected was Qian’an County, Jilin Province, China. A total of 141 soil samples were collected, and their reflectance spectra were measured in situ. Time-series Sentinel-2 images were acquired for 2022 to 2024. The field reflectance spectra were used to develop a prediction model and examine the sensitivity of the prediction to the spectral sampling interval. Genetic algorithm (GA) and partial least squares regression (PLSR) were adopted for model calibration using the full spectral range of the field reflectance spectra, and multiple linear regression (MLR) was adopted to calibrate the prediction model using multispectral datasets. In prediction of soil pH using the full spectral range, root mean square error (RMSE) and coefficient of determination (R 2 ) values are 0.29 and 0.87. In the prediction using multispectral datasets, the optimal RMSE and R 2 values were 0.45 and 0.70 for the prediction using identified important spectral bands of the field reflectance spectra and 0.45 and 0.69 for the prediction using simulated Sentinel-2 spectra. A six-band prediction model developed using simulated Sentinel-2 spectra was selected to predict and monitor soil pH using time-series Sentinel-2 remote sensing images. The generated pH maps depicted the spatial distribution of soil pH, and the predicted values were comparable to those obtained by chemical analysis in the variation range. Spatial variations in soil pH from 2022 to 2024 were revealed with pH maps generated from time-series remote sensing images. This study provides an alternative for the rapid prediction and monitoring of soil pH using Sentinel-2 remote sensing imagery. • Important spectral bands for the prediction of soil pH remain relatively stable. • The sensitivity of soil pH prediction to spectral sampling interval is moderate. • Sentinel-2 remote sensing imagery can be used for predicting soil pH. • Short-wave infrared spectral bands help improve the prediction of soil pH. • Time-series Sentinel-2 images achieve the monitoring of soil pH over time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.620
Threshold uncertainty score0.302

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it