Change in Urine Albumin-Creatinine Ratio and Occurrence of Hyperkalemia in Patients Initiating Finerenone in the USA: A Cohort Study from the FOUNTAIN Platform
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: In 2021, finerenone - a novel, selective nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist - was approved in the USA to treat adults with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D). This study aimed to describe characteristics and short-term outcomes of patients prescribed finerenone since regulatory approval. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using claims and electronic health records data from the OM1 Real-World Data Cloud™. A total of 15,948 US adults with a previous diagnosis of CKD and T2D who initiated 10 mg or 20 mg finerenone between July 2021 and August 2023 were included. Dosing was evaluated at baseline and over up to 12-month follow-up. Change from baseline in urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) was evaluated at 4 and 12 months (among 913 and 443 patients, respectively, with available repeat UACR values). Hyperkalemia occurrence was determined at 12 months and over total follow-up. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 7.2 months. Mean age was 70.3 years, and 44.1% were female. At baseline (-365; 0 days), 70% had CKD stage 3; for patients with UACR measurements, 80.8% had moderate/severe albuminuria (≥30 mg/g). Median UACR was 203 mg/g. Co-medication use was ACE inhibitors/ARBs (51%), SGLT2is (38%), and GLP-1 RAs (26%). 86% of patients initiated 10 mg finerenone, and among 2,212 patients still under observation at 12 months, 70% were on 10 mg. For finerenone initiators with available UACR data, UACR was reduced by 33% at 4 months and 38% at 12 months. Hyperkalemia occurred in 1.2% of the cohort by 12 months (incidence 2.0 per 100 person-years). CONCLUSION: Patients who initiated finerenone had a notable reduction in median UACR at 4 months, sustained at 12 months; hyperkalemia occurrence appeared to be low. These initial findings from US clinical practice should be complemented by results from other real-world cohorts of patients started on finerenone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".